I have been involved
in training & development for over 20 years now and this is an interesting
question that I have recently been asked by a client. Is it a good idea to get the training that we are doing
accredited?
From the trainer’s
perspective it gives us a framework to work within and makes the design &
development part of the training cycle easier as there is a structured outline. However it can be restrictive to the
creativeness of the design process and also not meet the identified needs of
the people who will be attending the programme.
So what about it from
the client’s viewpoint? It gives
their people a nationally recognised qualification and this can be measured in
line with other businesses and prospective employees. The downside can often be the amount of time that the
student needs to complete the designated work. Do you give them study time at work? Study time at home? Or
do you expect the work to be completed in their own time? This is perhaps a hidden
cost to the learning process that is not always accounted for.
What about the person
who is attending the training? On
the plus side it means that they have a nationally recognised qualification at
the end, however it does mean that they have to do work that is marked and
because it is like going back to school, it puts many people off. Also from my experience the delegate is
not often told by their employer that there is additional work involved to get
the qualification!
So I think the jury is
probably out on this one!!
I deliver both
accredited and non-accredited courses to my clients and as reflected above,
there are pro’s & con’s to both.
From recent experience
I would ask people who set the criteria for accredited work to not try and get
too much information into too little a timeframe. It would appear that accredited programmes are in danger of
becoming taught programmes with little or not interaction with the learners,
just so that the content can be shoe horned into the given timeframe.
Likewise I think as
trainers and managers we should all be working towards an agreed standard so
that there is consistency in courses that are delivered by doing effective
needs analysis at the beginning of the process. This has to be the responsibility of the both the client and
the deliverer and should be clarified in writing as part of the contract of
work. It is not just a question of “I need my managers to be qualified” it is a
question of identifying the actual training need in the first place, but that
is whole different situation for another discussion!
Thanks for your time,
Suzanne Unsworth